AirBFT Airride struts Shock absorber damping test report
Test object:
1: Comparison of damping coefficient between light vehicle and heavy vehicle
(front shock absorber: Buick Kaiyue vs Mercedes Benz E-class W212);
2: Comparison of damping coefficient between light vehicle and heavy vehicle
(front shock absorber: Modern cool double door coupe vs Mercedes Benz
S-class w220);
Test method:
Because the damping oil is cooling when the new shock absorber is not active,
and the test results are unstable, each shock absorber is tested continuously
for 8 times, subject to the test results of the 8th time, and the damping is 1
section.
Analytical theory:
Resilience: the tension required for the shock absorber to recover after being
pressed down;
Compression force: the pressure required when the shock absorber is pressed
down;
Comparison of different shock absorbers of the same model: those with small
compression force and large resilience are more comfortable shock absorbers;
The damping force of large vehicles will be heavier than that of small vehicles.
Test results and analysis：1.Comparison of damping coefficient between light vehicle and heavy vehicle
(front shock absorber: Buick Kaiyue vs Mercedes Benz E-class W212)
Results comparative analysis:
The resilience of each linear speed W212 is greater than that of Kaiyue; The
compression force of W212 is greater than that of Kaiyue, so the damping force
of shock absorption large vehicles is greater than that of small vehicles.
Test results and analysis：
2.Comparison of damping coefficient between light vehicle and heavy vehicle
(front shock absorber: Modern cool double door coupe vs Mercedes Benz
S-class w220);
Results comparative analysis:
The resilience of each linear speed w220 is greater than that of Coolpad; The
compression force of w220 is greater than that of Coolpad, so the shock absorption
of large vehicles is greater than that of small vehicles.
2022.1.5
